Most of these minors — as well as most of the families also crossing the border, usually mothers with young children — are arriving through Mexico from other Central American countries, and especially from Honduras and El Salvador, where they are fleeing poverty and some of the worst violent crime in the world.Unlike their Mexican peers, these kids can’t just be turned away at the border, a federal anti-trafficking law mandates that they receive temporary relocation, assistance, and an immigration hearing.Yet as the numbers of unaccompanied minors and anti-immigrant protests across the country have grown, some have called for those provisions — or “the Central American exception,” as some critics of it have dubbed it — to be repealed.'What exactly are we protecting ourselves from? Who exactly are we fearing?'
That children fleeing gangs and cartels should be met with such a lack of compassion is a serious cause of concern for some.“To me, the downright racist and xenophobic reactions of some Americans (and politicians) towards the Central American children — 'Deport the children! Deport them now!' — signify the real fear and anxiety we have towards our growing Latino population,” undocumented advocate Jose Antonio Vargas told VICE News.“I understand the argument that a civilized country needs to determine and protect its borders. I get that. But with all the billions of dollars and manpower that we’ve spent on the ‘border’, what exactly are we protecting ourselves from? Who exactly are we fearing?”'It’s not so much about an immigration question as it is about managing a sort of emergency refugee flow.'
The problem, immigration advocates say, is that much of the country fails to see the unaccompanied minors crisis as a humanitarian one — framing the debate in terms of border enforcement instead.“It is really imperative that we do not overreact to this situation by thinking that changing laws that are designed to protect kids is the solution. The protections are there because we know just how grave the circumstances can be,” Mary Giovagnoli, director of the Immigration Policy Center, told VICE News. “The children and families that are from Central America are coming because of extraordinary violence and threats to their wellbeing. That can’t be overlooked.”'The children and families that are from Central America are coming because of extraordinary violence and threats to their wellbeing. That can’t be overlooked.'
But regardless of the migrants’ ages or the violence they flee, many continue to see them as nothing but “illegals” and “border-crashers” — terms that immigration advocates have long objected to.“Using terms like ‘illegal’ and ‘border crasher’ dehumanize people and promote violence and discrimination. They send the message that immigrants are sub-human and undeserving, and they confuse the immigration debate,” Vargas said. “Parents send children to America for a better life, not to crash some party.”The migrant children are seeking out border patrol not trying to evade them. Why would Rick Perry send soldiers to confront the kids?
— Joaquin Castro (@JoaquinCastrotx)July 21, 2014
White House officials, who said in the past that deploying the National Guard would be ineffective, dismissed Perry’s announcement as headline-grabbing.“Gov. Perry has referred repeatedly to his desire to make a symbolic statement to the people of Central America that the border is closed,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said. “It seems to me that a much more powerful symbol would be the bipartisan passage of legislation that would actually make a historic investment in border security and send an additional 20,000 personnel to the border.”'This isn’t about the typical issues of illegal immigration or people avoiding detection.'
We should be sending the Red Cross to the border not the National Guard. — Joaquin Castro (@JoaquinCastrotx)July 21, 2014
“We have continued to stress that our borders are not open to illegal migration and that if you enter the United States illegally, we will send you back,” DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson said in a statement. “Equally important, those who prey upon migrants for financial gain will be targeted, arrested, and prosecuted.”Earlier this month, President Obama asked Congress for $3.7 billion to deal with the problem — boosting border patrols, building more immigration facilities, and hiring judges to process thousands of migrants’ cases. But lawmakers from both parties have been debating both the money and changes to the anti-trafficking provisions to come with it.So far, much like like the oft-touted (and completely stalled) talks of immigration reform itself, that has gone nowhere, drowned in polarizing politics. And with Congress about to check out for its five-week summer recess, the “situation” on the border promises to only get worse.Whatever happened to immigration reform? Read more here.Follow Alice Speri on Twitter: @alicesperi'If you enter the United States illegally, we will send you back.'